Difference between revisions of "Self-Assembly of Discrete Self-Similar Fractals"

From self-assembly wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{PaperTemplate
 
{{PaperTemplate
 
|title=Self-Assembly of Discrete Self-Similar Fractals
 
|title=Self-Assembly of Discrete Self-Similar Fractals
|abstract=In this paper, we search for theoretical limitations of the Tile Assembly Model (TAM), along with
+
|abstract=In this paper, we search for theoretical limitations of the Tile Assembly Model ([[Tile Assembly Model|TAM]]), along with
 
techniques to work around such limitations. Specifically, we investigate the self-assembly of fractal shapes
 
techniques to work around such limitations. Specifically, we investigate the self-assembly of fractal shapes
 
in the TAM. We prove that no self-similar fractal weakly self-assembles at temperature 1 in a locally
 
in the TAM. We prove that no self-similar fractal weakly self-assembles at temperature 1 in a locally

Revision as of 16:22, 1 March 2012

Published on: 2008/03/12

Abstract

In this paper, we search for theoretical limitations of the Tile Assembly Model (TAM), along with techniques to work around such limitations. Specifically, we investigate the self-assembly of fractal shapes in the TAM. We prove that no self-similar fractal weakly self-assembles at temperature 1 in a locally deterministic tile assembly system, and that certain kinds of discrete self-similar fractals do not strictly self-assemble at any temperature. Additionally, we extend the fiber construction of Lathrop, Lutz and Summers (2007) to show that any discrete self-similar fractal belonging to a particular class of "nice" discrete self-similar fractals has a fibered version that strictly self-assembles in the TAM.

Authors

Matthew J. Patitz and Scott M. Summers

File

media:SADSSF journal.pdf